Lobbying on Higher Ed - Ottawa (March 2026 edition)
Once a month, we partner up with LobbyIQ to update our readers on recent movements in the federal lobbying landscape in Ottawa. We provide separate coverage for each channel, defined by the most relevant industries, organizations, institutions, and subject matters.
Key Takeaways β Higher Ed
- Lobbying activity totalled 271 meetings in February 2026, up from a 12-month average of 207.6.
- The biggest moves were in Universities, colleges and research institutes and Science and engineering research.
- University of Saskatchewan, British Columbia Institute of Technology were more active than usual.

Section A: The Themes Hidden in February 2026 Data
International Student Permit Caps Reshape University Recruitment
A substantial cap on international student permits for 2026, with new requirements and significant exemptions for graduate studies, continues to disrupt university recruitment strategies and financial planning, as seen in meetings between International Business University and Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC). This policy shift coincides with a notable spike in lobbying by organizations such as Navitas Canada Holdings Inc. with the House of Commons and the Deans Council - Agriculture, Food & Veterinary Medicine with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), seeking to influence rules affecting internationalization, research capacity, and revenue stabilization.
π 2026 Canada Study Permit and PGWP Guide: Processing Times and Rules ... Β· Canadaβs rules are shaping study choices for international students
Federal Funding Surge Drives Research Lobbying Boom
A multi-billion-dollar federal investment package for research infrastructure, talent, and high-priority innovation areas has galvanized university lobbying in Ottawa. The timing of these measures, particularly the Impact+ Research Chairs and targeted AI/STEM funding, closely aligns with advocacy for higher education's leadership in research and commercialization.
Labour-Linked Permit Pathways Impact International Student and College Graduate Prospects
Tighter rules for post-graduation work permits that now closely tie eligibility to labour market needs have altered pathways for college and diploma graduates, while maintaining broad access for master's and PhD students. This change coincides with sector lobbying by Polytechnics Canada with Employment and Social Development Canada, Brock University at the House of Commons, and Let's Talk Science with ESDC, emphasizing targeted talent retention, STEM skills, and support for underrepresented groups entering innovation-driven fields.
π Canadaβs rules are shaping study choices for international students Β· 2026 Canada Study Permit and PGWP Guide: Processing Times and Rules ...
Section B: Lobbying Activity by Industry
This section compares, by NAICS industry, the lobbying activity in Ottawa last month to its historical average.

Lobbying activity across this channel totalled 271 meetings in February 2026, up from a 12-month average of 208. The most active industry was Universities, colleges and research institutes, while Educational services rose above its recent baseline.
The industries with the most notable increases in lobbying this month include Educational services logged 25 meetings, up from an average of 18, and Universities, colleges and research institutes logged 238 meetings, up from an average of 168.
Science and engineering research had 8 meetings, down from an average of 22.
Section C: Lobbying by Industry for the Past Year
To contextualize, we show each industry's lobbying activity over the past 12 months. The combined view from Section B and C shows you whether recent differences are persistent trends or a break from the norm.
Top Industry Residual Trends for 2026-02

Universities, colleges and research institutes saw lobbying run notably above expected levels in February 2026.
β³ Universities, colleges and research institutes has been on a broadly upward trajectory in lobbying over the past year.
β³ Universities, colleges and research institutes displayed high volatility, suggesting irregular or event-driven engagement.
Science and engineering research saw lobbying run notably below expected levels in February 2026.
β³ Science and engineering research has been on a broadly upward trajectory in lobbying over the past year.
β³ Science and engineering research displayed high volatility, suggesting irregular or event-driven engagement.
β³ Educational services has been on a broadly upward trajectory in lobbying over the past year.
β³ Educational services displayed high volatility, suggesting irregular or event-driven engagement.
Section D: Lobbying Activity by Organization
In this section, we see the organizations with the most unusual lobbying behavior last month, defined by either unusually high or unusually low lobbying activity.

The organizations with the most notable increases in lobbying this month include University of Saskatchewan, British Columbia Institute of Technology, University of Alberta, University of Manitoba, and Toronto Metropolitan University.

Section E: Lobbying of Government Institutions in the Past Month
Every time an organization lobbies, there is a government official representing a government institution at the other side of the table. This section shows the industry-institutions pairs with the most unusual lobbying behavior last month, defined by either unusually high or unusually low lobbying activity. Below that, we show the corresponding organization-institution pairs.
Industries β Government Institutions

Organizations β Government Institutions

The busiest industry β institution corridors this month:
β³ Universities, colleges and research institutes β House of Commons: 72 meetings (avg 37, +94%).
β³ Universities, colleges and research institutes β Privy Council Office (PCO): 14 meetings (avg 5, +200%).
The busiest organization β institution corridors this month:
β³ British Columbia Institute of Technology β House of Commons: 11 meetings (avg 2, +595%).
β³ University of Alberta β Privy Council Office (PCO): 8 meetings (avg 1, +700%).
β³ Toronto Metropolitan University β House of Commons: 7 meetings (avg 1, +600%).
Section F: Industry and Organization Lobbying by Subject in the Past Month
All lobbying activity is tagged with a "subject matter". This section shows the industry-subject pairs with the most unusual lobbying behavior last month, defined by either unusually high or unusually low lobbying activity, and below it the organization-subject pairs with the most unusual lobbying behavior last month.
Industries β Subjects

Organizations β Subjects

The busiest industry β subject corridors this month:
β³ Universities, colleges and research institutes β Research and Development: 139 meetings (avg 108, +29%).
β³ Universities, colleges and research institutes β Science and Technology: 118 meetings (avg 93, +27%).
β³ Universities, colleges and research institutes β Education: 110 meetings (avg 77, +43%).
The busiest organization β subject corridors this month:
β³ Secure Future Research Ltd DBA ControlAI β Research and Development: 31 meetings (avg 3, +854%).
β³ Dairy Farmers of Manitoba β Research and Development: 25 meetings (avg 2, +1011%).
β³ Canadian Medical Association β Employment and Training: 22 meetings (avg 10, +118%).
Section G: Last Month's Most Lobbied Politicians and Civil Servants
This section presents a list of the politicians and civil servants who took the most meetings with key industry players last month.
Most Lobbied Individuals by Sector

Most Lobbied Individuals by Organization

Among the individuals with the most notable meeting activity (by sector) this month were Universities, colleges and research institutes β Wade Chang (House of Commons), Universities, colleges and research institutes β Manuel Tomic (Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED)) and Universities, colleges and research institutes β Michael Paramathasan (Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED)).
Among the individuals with the most notable meeting activity (by organization) this month were British Columbia Institute of Technology β Wade Chang (House of Commons), British Columbia Institute of Technology β Noemie Fiset-Tremblay (Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC)) and University of Alberta β Alison O'Leary (Privy Council Office (PCO)).