House of Commons Voting Analysis — Environment — Apr 13 – May 8, 2026

1 bill voted on Apr 13 – May 8, 2026. Most contested: Private Members' Business M-15 (Conservation donations).

House of Commons sitting block Apr 13 – May 8, 2026. Per-bill sections, sorted most-contested first.

1 bill 18.8% avg margin 1 close call (<20%)

1 bill went to a roll-call in this sitting block.

Most contested: Private Members' Business M-15 (Conservation donations) (Passed, 18.8% margin).

During the April 13 to May 8, 2026 sitting block, the House of Commons addressed environmental policy through the passage of Private Members' Motion M-15, which focused on encouraging conservation donations. The motion, which passed with a notable margin, reflects ongoing parliamentary interest in leveraging private contributions to support environmental protection efforts. While not a government bill, M-15 signals cross-party recognition of the role that individual and organizational donations can play in advancing conservation objectives across Canada. The debate and outcome underscore the House’s willingness to supplement federal and provincial environmental initiatives with mechanisms that incentivize broader public participation.

Private Members' Business M-15 (Conservation donations)

DIV-97, Private Members' Business M-15, addresses the facilitation and incentivization of conservation donations, aiming to bolster private sector contributions to environmental protection efforts. The bill seeks to enhance mechanisms for land and resource conservation, which has implications for federal partnerships with provinces and non-profit organizations involved in ecological stewardship. Its passage reflects ongoing parliamentary interest in leveraging private philanthropy to supplement public conservation initiatives.
DIV-97 No 3rd reading yet Latest vote: Y 193 · N 132 · P 10 Latest gap 61 votes (18.8%)
Stage: Other · 1 roll-call (no 3rd reading yet) · first vote 2026-04-15
Party split
LIB165/0 (5p)CON0/132 (4p)BQ21/0 (1p)NDP6/0GRN1/0
Yea Nay (Np) = MPs formally paired — sit out the tally • marks parties with <75% internal cohesion © Queen Street Analytics