European Parliament Voting Analysis — Environment — Feb 9–12, 2026
1 bills voted on Feb 9–12, 2026. Most contested: REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the.
EP voting block Feb 9–12, 2026. Per-bill sections, sorted most-contested first.
1 bills
26.6% avg margin
0 close calls (<20%)
1 bills went to a roll-call vote in this voting block.
Most contested: REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Co (Failed, 26.6% margin).
S&D saw the most party-line defections (3).
During the February 9–12, 2026 voting block, the European Parliament focused on climate policy within the Environment portfolio, specifically addressing the EU’s legislative framework for achieving climate neutrality. The main item was a proposal to amend Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, which underpins the EU’s legally binding commitment to climate neutrality. The proposed changes failed to secure majority support, reflecting ongoing divisions among member states and political groups over the pace and scope of climate action. This outcome signals persistent challenges in aligning national interests with the EU’s long-term environmental objectives.
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality
This proposal sought to amend the EU Climate Law (Regulation (EU) 2021/1119), which sets the legal framework for achieving climate neutrality in the European Union by 2050. The amendments aimed to adjust targets or mechanisms related to emissions reductions, a central issue for the EU’s Green Deal and its international climate commitments under the Paris Agreement. The vote outcome reflects ongoing divisions within the Parliament over the pace and scope of climate policy, with internal splits in major party groups highlighting the contentious nature of proposed changes.
A10-0223/2025
No final vote recorded
Latest vote: Y 223 · N 394 · A 27
Latest gap 171 votes (26.6%)
Party split
Yes
No
Abstain
• marks parties with <75% internal cohesion
© Queen Street Analytics
Broke with party on this vote
- S&D 3: Dragoş Benea (Y), Gheorghe Cârciu (Y), Maria Grapini (A)
- Renew 3: Engin Eroglu (Y), Hilde Vautmans (A), Joachim Streit (Y)
